Difference between revisions of "Karel van Gent (17th century)"
[unchecked revision] | [checked revision] |
GameoAdmin (talk | contribs) (CSV import - 20130816) |
m (Text replace - "<strong> </strong>" to " ") |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Karel van Gent | + | Karel van Gent (Carel van Ghendt) was the reputed author of <em>[[Beginsel en voortganck der geschillen, scheuringen, en verdeeltheden onder de gene die Doopsgesinden Genoemt worden, Het (Booklet)|Het Beginsel en voortganck der geschillen, ]]</em>[[Beginsel en voortganck der geschillen, scheuringen, en verdeeltheden onder de gene die Doopsgesinden Genoemt worden, Het (Booklet)|<em>scheuringen, en verdeeltheden onder de gene die Doopsgesinden Genoemt warden</em>]], written in 1615 but first published in 1658 at [[Amsterdam (Noord-Holland, Netherlands)|Amsterdam]]. W. J. Kühler considers him to be the author and calls him "the best historian among the old Doopsgesinden" <em>(Geschiedenis </em>I, 365). De Hoop Scheffer held him to be the author, Karel Vos flatly denies the authorship, while [[Zijpp, Nanne van der (1900-1965)|N. van der Zijpp]] and [[Krahn, Cornelius (1902-1990)|Cornelius Krahn]] are uncertain. A certain Carel van Ghendt was one of the two secretaries who wrote the <em>Protocol </em>of the Emden disputation of 1578 (printed in 1579), but no trace of a Carel van Gent has been found among the Doopsgezinden of the first century. |
For the details of the life of the author of <em>Het Beginsel, </em>who might be Carel van Gent, see the article <em>Het Beginsel</em>. The most thorough discussion of the identification problem is that by [[Cramer, Samuel (1842-1913)|Samuel Cramer]] in <em>Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica </em>7, 491-500 | For the details of the life of the author of <em>Het Beginsel, </em>who might be Carel van Gent, see the article <em>Het Beginsel</em>. The most thorough discussion of the identification problem is that by [[Cramer, Samuel (1842-1913)|Samuel Cramer]] in <em>Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica </em>7, 491-500 | ||
− | |||
− | |||
{{GAMEO_footer|hp=Vol. 3, p. 151|date=1957|a1_last=Bender|a1_first=Harold S|a2_last= |a2_first= }} | {{GAMEO_footer|hp=Vol. 3, p. 151|date=1957|a1_last=Bender|a1_first=Harold S|a2_last= |a2_first= }} |
Latest revision as of 03:20, 13 April 2014
Karel van Gent (Carel van Ghendt) was the reputed author of Het Beginsel en voortganck der geschillen, scheuringen, en verdeeltheden onder de gene die Doopsgesinden Genoemt warden, written in 1615 but first published in 1658 at Amsterdam. W. J. Kühler considers him to be the author and calls him "the best historian among the old Doopsgesinden" (Geschiedenis I, 365). De Hoop Scheffer held him to be the author, Karel Vos flatly denies the authorship, while N. van der Zijpp and Cornelius Krahn are uncertain. A certain Carel van Ghendt was one of the two secretaries who wrote the Protocol of the Emden disputation of 1578 (printed in 1579), but no trace of a Carel van Gent has been found among the Doopsgezinden of the first century.
For the details of the life of the author of Het Beginsel, who might be Carel van Gent, see the article Het Beginsel. The most thorough discussion of the identification problem is that by Samuel Cramer in Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica 7, 491-500
Author(s) | Harold S Bender |
---|---|
Date Published | 1957 |
Cite This Article
MLA style
Bender, Harold S. "Karel van Gent (17th century)." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. 1957. Web. 24 Nov 2024. https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Karel_van_Gent_(17th_century)&oldid=120337.
APA style
Bender, Harold S. (1957). Karel van Gent (17th century). Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. Retrieved 24 November 2024, from https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Karel_van_Gent_(17th_century)&oldid=120337.
Adapted by permission of Herald Press, Harrisonburg, Virginia, from Mennonite Encyclopedia, Vol. 3, p. 151. All rights reserved.
©1996-2024 by the Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. All rights reserved.