Difference between revisions of "Plain Coat"

From GAMEO
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[checked revision][checked revision]
(CSV import - 20130820)
m (Text replacement - "[[Lancaster Mennonite Conference (Mennonite Church USA)" to "[[LMC: a Fellowship of Anabaptist Churches")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
In Colonial America the man's coat was a [[Frock Coat|frock coat]] without lapel, and buttoned to the throat. It had a long, split tail for convenience in horseback riding. In the early 19th century the collar rose higher and higher on the back and finally turned over to form the modern roll collar and lapel. At the same time the tail shortened to form the modern sack coat. The ministers in gen­eral, and some of the laity, in the more conserva­tive Mennonite groups objected to these changes, and clung to the old-fashioned frock coat with its long tail and no lapel. In the strictest groups such as the [[Old Order Amish|Old Order Amish]] the old collarless coat, known as the "plain" coat, is still worn by ministry and laity alike, and is fastened with hooks and eyes rather than buttons. In the eastern sector of the Mennonite Church ([[Mennonite Church (MC)|Mennonite Church]] [MC]) ([[Franconia Mennonite Conference (Mennonite Church USA)|Franconia]], [[Lancaster Mennonite Conference (Mennonite Church USA)|Lancas­ter]], [[Washington-Franklin Mennonite Conference|Washington-Franklin]], and [[Virginia Mennonite Conference (Mennonite Church USA)|Virginia]] conferences) the ministers generally still wear the split tail frock coat (somewhat shortened) with the "plain" collar, while some of the laity wear a collarless sack coat, and others wear the conventional sack coat with roll collar and lapel. In the remainder of the church (MC) the standard practice of the ministers is to wear the sack coat with the "plain" collar, but most laymen wear the conventional coat with lapel. (See also [[Dress|Dress]].) Mennonite deviations in dress from the conventions of the surrounding culture are regarded by many as symbols of nonconformity to the world.
+
In Colonial America the man's coat was a [[Frock Coat|frock coat]] without lapel, and buttoned to the throat. It had a long, split tail for convenience in horseback riding. In the early 19th century the collar rose higher and higher on the back and finally turned over to form the modern roll collar and lapel. At the same time the tail shortened to form the modern sack coat. The ministers in gen­eral, and some of the laity, in the more conserva­tive Mennonite groups objected to these changes, and clung to the old-fashioned frock coat with its long tail and no lapel. In the strictest groups such as the [[Old Order Amish|Old Order Amish]] the old collarless coat, known as the "plain" coat, is still worn by ministry and laity alike, and is fastened with hooks and eyes rather than buttons. In the eastern sector of the Mennonite Church ([[Mennonite Church (MC)|Mennonite Church]] [MC]) ([[Franconia Mennonite Conference (Mennonite Church USA)|Franconia]], [[LMC: a Fellowship of Anabaptist Churches|Lancas­ter]], [[Washington-Franklin Mennonite Conference|Washington-Franklin]], and [[Virginia Mennonite Conference (Mennonite Church USA)|Virginia]] conferences) the ministers generally still wear the split tail frock coat (somewhat shortened) with the "plain" collar, while some of the laity wear a collarless sack coat, and others wear the conventional sack coat with roll collar and lapel. In the remainder of the church (MC) the standard practice of the ministers is to wear the sack coat with the "plain" collar, but most laymen wear the conventional coat with lapel. (See also [[Dress|Dress]].) Mennonite deviations in dress from the conventions of the surrounding culture are regarded by many as symbols of nonconformity to the world.
  
 
The Amish congregations descending from the Alsatian Amish immigrants of 1815-60 did not bring the "plain" coat with them from Europe and did not adopt it generally until well into the first quarter of the 20th century and then only for the ministers, not for laymen. In the course of the first quarter of the century most of the Mennonite and Amish conferences (Mennonite Church) adopted regulations re­quiring the "plain" coat for the ministers and rec­ommending it for the laity, hence the "plain" coat is often called the "regulation" coat. The high tide of the movement was about 1920-30. In the Lan­caster Mennonite Conference in the 1950s all male church workers, including Sunday-school teachers, were re­quired to wear the "plain" coat as a condition for service. Further west the trend seemed to be toward less wearing and less requirement of the "plain" coat, even for ministers. In some sections the "plain" vest was also worn with the plain coat. Be­cause in most sections of the church west of the Allegheny Mountains very few laymen wore it, the plain coat had in effect become a preacher's coat or clerical coat, and had indeed a very similar appear­ance to the clerical coat worn by some [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] and Episcopalian clergymen. Its origin, however, has no connection with the clerical coat.
 
The Amish congregations descending from the Alsatian Amish immigrants of 1815-60 did not bring the "plain" coat with them from Europe and did not adopt it generally until well into the first quarter of the 20th century and then only for the ministers, not for laymen. In the course of the first quarter of the century most of the Mennonite and Amish conferences (Mennonite Church) adopted regulations re­quiring the "plain" coat for the ministers and rec­ommending it for the laity, hence the "plain" coat is often called the "regulation" coat. The high tide of the movement was about 1920-30. In the Lan­caster Mennonite Conference in the 1950s all male church workers, including Sunday-school teachers, were re­quired to wear the "plain" coat as a condition for service. Further west the trend seemed to be toward less wearing and less requirement of the "plain" coat, even for ministers. In some sections the "plain" vest was also worn with the plain coat. Be­cause in most sections of the church west of the Allegheny Mountains very few laymen wore it, the plain coat had in effect become a preacher's coat or clerical coat, and had indeed a very similar appear­ance to the clerical coat worn by some [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]] and Episcopalian clergymen. Its origin, however, has no connection with the clerical coat.

Latest revision as of 19:24, 8 August 2023

In Colonial America the man's coat was a frock coat without lapel, and buttoned to the throat. It had a long, split tail for convenience in horseback riding. In the early 19th century the collar rose higher and higher on the back and finally turned over to form the modern roll collar and lapel. At the same time the tail shortened to form the modern sack coat. The ministers in gen­eral, and some of the laity, in the more conserva­tive Mennonite groups objected to these changes, and clung to the old-fashioned frock coat with its long tail and no lapel. In the strictest groups such as the Old Order Amish the old collarless coat, known as the "plain" coat, is still worn by ministry and laity alike, and is fastened with hooks and eyes rather than buttons. In the eastern sector of the Mennonite Church (Mennonite Church [MC]) (Franconia, Lancas­ter, Washington-Franklin, and Virginia conferences) the ministers generally still wear the split tail frock coat (somewhat shortened) with the "plain" collar, while some of the laity wear a collarless sack coat, and others wear the conventional sack coat with roll collar and lapel. In the remainder of the church (MC) the standard practice of the ministers is to wear the sack coat with the "plain" collar, but most laymen wear the conventional coat with lapel. (See also Dress.) Mennonite deviations in dress from the conventions of the surrounding culture are regarded by many as symbols of nonconformity to the world.

The Amish congregations descending from the Alsatian Amish immigrants of 1815-60 did not bring the "plain" coat with them from Europe and did not adopt it generally until well into the first quarter of the 20th century and then only for the ministers, not for laymen. In the course of the first quarter of the century most of the Mennonite and Amish conferences (Mennonite Church) adopted regulations re­quiring the "plain" coat for the ministers and rec­ommending it for the laity, hence the "plain" coat is often called the "regulation" coat. The high tide of the movement was about 1920-30. In the Lan­caster Mennonite Conference in the 1950s all male church workers, including Sunday-school teachers, were re­quired to wear the "plain" coat as a condition for service. Further west the trend seemed to be toward less wearing and less requirement of the "plain" coat, even for ministers. In some sections the "plain" vest was also worn with the plain coat. Be­cause in most sections of the church west of the Allegheny Mountains very few laymen wore it, the plain coat had in effect become a preacher's coat or clerical coat, and had indeed a very similar appear­ance to the clerical coat worn by some Roman Catholic and Episcopalian clergymen. Its origin, however, has no connection with the clerical coat.

The Church of the Brethren, which formerly had the custom of wearing the "plain" coat similar to the Mennonite custom herein described, had largely dropped it by the late 1950s. Among the Quakers it had completely disappeared. The Brethren in Christ still retained it in the 1950s.


Author(s) John C Wenger
Date Published 1959

Cite This Article

MLA style

Wenger, John C. "Plain Coat." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. 1959. Web. 22 Nov 2024. https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Plain_Coat&oldid=177272.

APA style

Wenger, John C. (1959). Plain Coat. Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. Retrieved 22 November 2024, from https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Plain_Coat&oldid=177272.




Hpbuttns.png

Adapted by permission of Herald Press, Harrisonburg, Virginia, from Mennonite Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, pp. 183-184. All rights reserved.


©1996-2024 by the Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. All rights reserved.