Difference between revisions of "Wilde, Willem (1825-1904)"
| [unchecked revision] | [unchecked revision] |
GameoAdmin (talk | contribs) (CSV import - 20130816) |
GameoAdmin (talk | contribs) (CSV import - 20130820) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Willem Wilde, a Dutch [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]], published two papers, "De Geloofsvervolging der 16de eeuw" and "Merkwaardige cijfers betreffende de geloofsvervol ging," in <em>Studiën,</em> 1877 and 1894. In these papers he accused [[Braght, Tieleman Jansz van (1625-1664)|T. J. van Braght]] of partiality and inexactness in his [[Martyrs' Mirror|<em>Martyrs' Mirror</em>]]. Wilde was opposed by [[Cramer, Samuel (1842-1913)|Samuel Cramer]] in <em>Doopsgezinde Bijdragen </em>1899, 70 ff. Thereupon Wilde published <em>Zonderlinge Critiek</em> (Amsterdam, 1900), and Cramer replied in [[Zondagsbode, De|<em>De Zondagsbode</em>]] and in <em>Doopsgezinde Bijdragen</em> 1900, 191-210. | Willem Wilde, a Dutch [[Roman Catholic Church|Roman Catholic]], published two papers, "De Geloofsvervolging der 16de eeuw" and "Merkwaardige cijfers betreffende de geloofsvervol ging," in <em>Studiën,</em> 1877 and 1894. In these papers he accused [[Braght, Tieleman Jansz van (1625-1664)|T. J. van Braght]] of partiality and inexactness in his [[Martyrs' Mirror|<em>Martyrs' Mirror</em>]]. Wilde was opposed by [[Cramer, Samuel (1842-1913)|Samuel Cramer]] in <em>Doopsgezinde Bijdragen </em>1899, 70 ff. Thereupon Wilde published <em>Zonderlinge Critiek</em> (Amsterdam, 1900), and Cramer replied in [[Zondagsbode, De|<em>De Zondagsbode</em>]] and in <em>Doopsgezinde Bijdragen</em> 1900, 191-210. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{GAMEO_footer|hp=Vol. 4, p. 951|date=1959|a1_last=van der Zijpp|a1_first=Nanne|a2_last=|a2_first=}} | {{GAMEO_footer|hp=Vol. 4, p. 951|date=1959|a1_last=van der Zijpp|a1_first=Nanne|a2_last=|a2_first=}} | ||
Revision as of 19:38, 20 August 2013
Willem Wilde, a Dutch Roman Catholic, published two papers, "De Geloofsvervolging der 16de eeuw" and "Merkwaardige cijfers betreffende de geloofsvervol ging," in Studiën, 1877 and 1894. In these papers he accused T. J. van Braght of partiality and inexactness in his <em>Martyrs' Mirror</em>. Wilde was opposed by Samuel Cramer in Doopsgezinde Bijdragen 1899, 70 ff. Thereupon Wilde published Zonderlinge Critiek (Amsterdam, 1900), and Cramer replied in <em>De Zondagsbode</em> and in Doopsgezinde Bijdragen 1900, 191-210.
| Author(s) | Nanne van der Zijpp |
|---|---|
| Date Published | 1959 |
Cite This Article
MLA style
van der Zijpp, Nanne. "Wilde, Willem (1825-1904)." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. 1959. Web. 22 Nov 2024. https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Wilde,_Willem_(1825-1904)&oldid=86072.
APA style
van der Zijpp, Nanne. (1959). Wilde, Willem (1825-1904). Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. Retrieved 22 November 2024, from https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Wilde,_Willem_(1825-1904)&oldid=86072.
Adapted by permission of Herald Press, Harrisonburg, Virginia, from Mennonite Encyclopedia, Vol. 4, p. 951. All rights reserved.
©1996-2024 by the Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. All rights reserved.