Difference between revisions of "Alenson, Hans Arentsz (d. 1644)"

From GAMEO
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[unchecked revision][unchecked revision]
(CSV import - 20130816)
 
(CSV import - 20130820)
Line 1: Line 1:
  [[File:Alenson.jpg|300px|thumb|right|''Source: [http://dpc.uba.uva.nl/cgi/i/image/image-idx Bibliotheek van de Universiteit <br/> van Amsterdam: Doopsgezinde Prenten] Bibliotheek van de Universiteit  
+
[[File:Alenson.jpg|300px|thumb|right|''Source: [http://dpc.uba.uva.nl/cgi/i/image/image-idx Bibliotheek van de Universiteit <br/> van Amsterdam: Doopsgezinde Prenten] Bibliotheek van de Universiteit  
  
 
van Amsterdam: Doopsgezinde Prenten  
 
van Amsterdam: Doopsgezinde Prenten  
Line 5: Line 5:
 
'']]    Hans Arentsz Alenson was a Dutch Mennonite preacher. He was born at [[Hondschoote (Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France)|Hondschoote]] in [[Flanders (Belgium)|Flanders]], fled to [[Netherlands|Holland]], lived at [[Leiden (Zuid-Holland, Netherlands)|Leiden]], [[Amsterdam (Noord-Holland, Netherlands)|Amsterdam]] (after about 1591), [[Leeuwarden (Friesland, Netherlands)|Leeuwarden]] (after 1598), [[Delft (Zuid-Holland, Netherlands)|Delft]](about 1615), and [[Haarlem (Noord-Holland, Netherlands)|Haarlem]] (after about 1625), and died at an advanced age in April or May 1644  at Haarlem. At first he belonged to the [[Flemish Mennonites|Flemish]] Mennonites, but after being banned he joined the [[w381.html|Waterlander]] group. By trade he was at first a grocer and afterwards a weaver. The hypothesis of some art experts, Hofstede de Groot and Valentiner among others, that the two portraits in the Penrhyn Collection in England, painted by [[Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn (1607-1669)|Rembrandt]] in 1634, represent Hans Alenson and his wife, has proved to be false. The pictures in question are those of the English clergyman John Ellison of [[Norwich (Norfolk County, England)|Norwich]] and his wife.
 
'']]    Hans Arentsz Alenson was a Dutch Mennonite preacher. He was born at [[Hondschoote (Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France)|Hondschoote]] in [[Flanders (Belgium)|Flanders]], fled to [[Netherlands|Holland]], lived at [[Leiden (Zuid-Holland, Netherlands)|Leiden]], [[Amsterdam (Noord-Holland, Netherlands)|Amsterdam]] (after about 1591), [[Leeuwarden (Friesland, Netherlands)|Leeuwarden]] (after 1598), [[Delft (Zuid-Holland, Netherlands)|Delft]](about 1615), and [[Haarlem (Noord-Holland, Netherlands)|Haarlem]] (after about 1625), and died at an advanced age in April or May 1644  at Haarlem. At first he belonged to the [[Flemish Mennonites|Flemish]] Mennonites, but after being banned he joined the [[w381.html|Waterlander]] group. By trade he was at first a grocer and afterwards a weaver. The hypothesis of some art experts, Hofstede de Groot and Valentiner among others, that the two portraits in the Penrhyn Collection in England, painted by [[Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn (1607-1669)|Rembrandt]] in 1634, represent Hans Alenson and his wife, has proved to be false. The pictures in question are those of the English clergyman John Ellison of [[Norwich (Norfolk County, England)|Norwich]] and his wife.
  
Alenson is known only as the author of the very important <em>Tegen-Bericht op den voorreden van't groote Martelaer-Boeck der Doopsgezinde, </em>which was published at Haarlem in 1630 from the press of Jan Pietersz Does. The booklet was reprinted in [[Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica|&lt;em&gt;Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica&lt;/em&gt;]] VII (1910, 139-266). The purpose of the<em> Tegen-Bericht </em>is to show (1) that [[Ries, Hans de (1553–1638)|Hans de Ries]] and the other liberal Waterlander and [[Flemish Mennonites|Flemish]] compilers of the first edition of the <em>groote martelaarsboek </em>had not, as the strictly orthodox [[Frisian Mennonites|Frisian]] publishers of the third edition of 1626 had charged, falsified the martyrs' confessions and omitted part of the [[Hoffman, Melchior (ca. 1495-1544?) |Melchior Hoffman]]doctrine of the incarnation; and (2) that [[Menno Simons (1496-1561)|Menno]] and his contemporaries had in many points been more liberal than the unbending Frisians claimed in what they proclaimed in 1626 to be the true teachings of [[Menno Simons (1496-1561)|Menno Simons]]. The value of the booklet lies in all the information which Alenson gives from his personal acquaintance and conversation with several friends of Menno who had outlived him, as well as with various martyrs.        
+
Alenson is known only as the author of the very important <em>Tegen-Bericht op den voorreden van't groote Martelaer-Boeck der Doopsgezinde, </em>which was published at Haarlem in 1630 from the press of Jan Pietersz Does. The booklet was reprinted in [[Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica|&lt;em&gt;Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica&lt;/em&gt;]] VII (1910, 139-266). The purpose of the<em> Tegen-Bericht </em>is to show (1) that [[Ries, Hans de (1553–1638)|Hans de Ries]] and the other liberal Waterlander and [[Flemish Mennonites|Flemish]] compilers of the first edition of the <em>groote martelaarsboek </em>had not, as the strictly orthodox [[Frisian Mennonites|Frisian]] publishers of the third edition of 1626 had charged, falsified the martyrs' confessions and omitted part of the [[Hoffman, Melchior (ca. 1495-1544?) |Melchior Hoffman]]doctrine of the incarnation; and (2) that [[Menno Simons (1496-1561)|Menno]] and his contemporaries had in many points been more liberal than the unbending Frisians claimed in what they proclaimed in 1626 to be the true teachings of [[Menno Simons (1496-1561)|Menno Simons]]. The value of the booklet lies in all the information which Alenson gives from his personal acquaintance and conversation with several friends of Menno who had outlived him, as well as with various martyrs.
 
 
 
 
 
= Bibliography =
 
= Bibliography =
 
Cramer, Samuel and Fredrik Pijper. <em>Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica</em>, 10 vols. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1903-1914: v. VII: 139-266.
 
Cramer, Samuel and Fredrik Pijper. <em>Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica</em>, 10 vols. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1903-1914: v. VII: 139-266.
Line 14: Line 12:
  
 
Wijnman, H. F.<em> Jaarboek Amstelodamum</em> (1931): 81 ff.
 
Wijnman, H. F.<em> Jaarboek Amstelodamum</em> (1931): 81 ff.
 
 
 
{{GAMEO_footer|hp=Vol. 1, p. 43|date=1955|a1_last=Cramer|a1_first=Samuel|a2_last=van der Zijpp|a2_first=Nanne}}
 
{{GAMEO_footer|hp=Vol. 1, p. 43|date=1955|a1_last=Cramer|a1_first=Samuel|a2_last=van der Zijpp|a2_first=Nanne}}

Revision as of 18:42, 20 August 2013

Source: Bibliotheek van de Universiteit <br/> van Amsterdam: Doopsgezinde Prenten Bibliotheek van de Universiteit van Amsterdam: Doopsgezinde Prenten

Hans Arentsz Alenson was a Dutch Mennonite preacher. He was born at Hondschoote in Flanders, fled to Holland, lived at Leiden, Amsterdam (after about 1591), Leeuwarden (after 1598), Delft(about 1615), and Haarlem (after about 1625), and died at an advanced age in April or May 1644  at Haarlem. At first he belonged to the Flemish Mennonites, but after being banned he joined the Waterlander group. By trade he was at first a grocer and afterwards a weaver. The hypothesis of some art experts, Hofstede de Groot and Valentiner among others, that the two portraits in the Penrhyn Collection in England, painted by Rembrandt in 1634, represent Hans Alenson and his wife, has proved to be false. The pictures in question are those of the English clergyman John Ellison of Norwich and his wife.

Alenson is known only as the author of the very important Tegen-Bericht op den voorreden van't groote Martelaer-Boeck der Doopsgezinde, which was published at Haarlem in 1630 from the press of Jan Pietersz Does. The booklet was reprinted in <em>Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica</em> VII (1910, 139-266). The purpose of the Tegen-Bericht is to show (1) that Hans de Ries and the other liberal Waterlander and Flemish compilers of the first edition of the groote martelaarsboek had not, as the strictly orthodox Frisian publishers of the third edition of 1626 had charged, falsified the martyrs' confessions and omitted part of the Melchior Hoffmandoctrine of the incarnation; and (2) that Menno and his contemporaries had in many points been more liberal than the unbending Frisians claimed in what they proclaimed in 1626 to be the true teachings of Menno Simons. The value of the booklet lies in all the information which Alenson gives from his personal acquaintance and conversation with several friends of Menno who had outlived him, as well as with various martyrs.

Bibliography

Cramer, Samuel and Fredrik Pijper. Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica, 10 vols. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1903-1914: v. VII: 139-266.

Hege, Christian and Christian Neff. Mennonitisches Lexikon, 4 vols. Frankfurt & Weierhof: Hege; Karlsruhe; Schneider, 1913-1967: v. I, 20.

Wijnman, H. F. Jaarboek Amstelodamum (1931): 81 ff.


Author(s) Samuel Cramer
Nanne van der Zijpp
Date Published 1955

Cite This Article

MLA style

Cramer, Samuel and Nanne van der Zijpp. "Alenson, Hans Arentsz (d. 1644)." Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. 1955. Web. 18 Dec 2024. https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Alenson,_Hans_Arentsz_(d._1644)&oldid=74607.

APA style

Cramer, Samuel and Nanne van der Zijpp. (1955). Alenson, Hans Arentsz (d. 1644). Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. Retrieved 18 December 2024, from https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Alenson,_Hans_Arentsz_(d._1644)&oldid=74607.




Hpbuttns.png

Adapted by permission of Herald Press, Harrisonburg, Virginia, from Mennonite Encyclopedia, Vol. 1, p. 43. All rights reserved.


©1996-2024 by the Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online. All rights reserved.