Gespauwde Klauw - Revision history

RichardThiessen: Text replace - "" to ""

2014-04-12T16:58:17Z

Text replace - "" to ""

RichardThiessen: Text replace - "date=1956|a1_last=van der Zijpp|a1_first=Nanne" to "date=1956|a1_last=Zijpp|a1_first=Nanne van der"

2014-01-20T08:32:07Z

Text replace - "date=1956|a1_last=van der Zijpp|a1_first=Nanne" to "date=1956|a1_last=Zijpp|a1_first=Nanne van der"

GameoAdmin: CSV import - 20130823

2013-08-23T14:34:06Z

CSV import - 20130823

GameoAdmin: CSV import - 20130820

2013-08-20T19:14:31Z

CSV import - 20130820

GameoAdmin: CSV import - 20130816

2013-08-16T19:32:38Z

CSV import - 20130816

New page

Gespauwde Klauw (Cloven Hoof). In the fall of 1534 a dispute took place at [[Amsterdam (Noord-Holland, Netherlands)|Amsterdam]] between the [[Anabaptism|Anabaptists]] leaders [[Jacob van Campen (1505-1535)|Jacob van Campen]], [[Obbe Philips (ca. 1500-1568)|Obbe Philips]], and [[Hans Scheerder (16th century)|Hans Scheerder]]. The theme of discussion was the question whether the Scriptures stand on "one hoof" or on "two hoofs," i.e., whether one should believe "that all that has happened in the Old Covenant corresponds with the New Covenant," meaning that the prophecies of the [[Old Testament|Old Testament]] will be realized in the [[New Testament|New Testament]], or that the Scriptures of the Old Testament are plain, not supposing a fulfillment in the Christian era. This theme is also repeatedly discussed by [[Hoffman, Melchior (ca. 1495-1544?) |Melchior Hoffman]], who defends the cloven hoof. "Ein ider muss der gespaltnen clawen wol warnemen. Denn alle Gottes wort doppelt oder zwiffach seint" ([[Linden, Friedrich Otto zur (1857-1927)|zur Linden]], Melchior Hofmann, 430). The expression "cloven hoof" is derived from Leviticus 11:3 and Deuteronomy 14:6; the theme is important, inasmuch as the problem disturbed Anabaptism in the [[Netherlands|Netherlands]] in its early period and Hoffman's theory, adopted by Jacob van Campen and also by Cornelis wt den Briel and later by the [[Münster Anabaptists|Münsterite]] leaders, opened the door wide for an unsound and dangerous typologizing and for the idea that the [[Kingdom of God|kingdom of God]] should bear the traits of the earthly kingdom of Israel, as[[Beukelszoon, Jan (ca. 1509-1536)|Jan van Leyden]] taught. On the other hand Obbe Philips could not believe that the Scriptures have a double meaning, asserting that the Scriptures stand on "one hoof." So he is a forerunner of [[Menno Simons (1496-1561)|Menno Simons]], who was averse to mystics and false allegories, and who states contrary to the Münsterites and [[Davidjorists|Davidjorists]] that the Scriptures are plain, and that one should teach and believe the express words of Christ. On this question see the writings of Melchior Hoffman.

= Bibliography =
Cramer, Samuel and Fredrik Pijper. Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica. The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1903-1914: V, 167, 177, 188, 189; VII, 137.

Doopsgezinde Bijdragen (1917): 133-135.

{{GAMEO_footer|hp=Vol. 2, p. 508|date=1956|a1_last=van der Zijpp|a1_first=Nanne|a2_last=|a2_first=}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Gespauwde Klauw (Cloven Hoof). In the fall of 1534 a dispute took place at [[Amsterdam (Noord-Holland, Netherlands)|Amsterdam]] between the [[Anabaptism|Anabaptists]] leaders [[Jacob van Campen (1505-1535)|Jacob van Campen]], [[Obbe Philips (ca. 1500-1568)|Obbe Philips]], and [[Hans Scheerder (16th century)|Hans Scheerder]]. The theme of discussion was the question whether the Scriptures stand on "one hoof" or on "two hoofs," i.e., whether one should believe "that all that has happened in the Old Covenant corresponds with the New Covenant," meaning that the prophecies of the [[Old Testament|Old Testament]] will be realized in the [[New Testament|New Testament]], or that the Scriptures of the Old Testament are plain, not supposing a fulfillment in the Christian era. This theme is also repeatedly discussed by [[Hoffman, Melchior (ca. 1495-1544?) |Melchior Hoffman]], who defends the cloven hoof. "Ein ider muss der gespaltnen clawen wol warnemen. Denn alle Gottes wort doppelt oder zwiffach seint" ([[Linden, Friedrich Otto zur (1857-1927)|zur Linden]], <em>Melchior Hofmann</em>, 430). The expression "cloven hoof" is derived from Leviticus 11:3 and Deuteronomy 14:6; the theme is important, inasmuch as the problem disturbed Anabaptism in the [[Netherlands|Netherlands]] in its early period and Hoffman's theory, adopted by Jacob van Campen and also by Cornelis wt den Briel and later by the [[Münster Anabaptists|Münsterite]] leaders, opened the door wide for an unsound and dangerous typologizing and for the idea that the [[Kingdom of God|kingdom of God]] should bear the traits of the earthly kingdom of Israel, as[[Beukelszoon, Jan (ca. 1509-1536)| Jan van Leyden]] taught. On the other hand Obbe Philips could not believe that the Scriptures have a double meaning, asserting that the Scriptures stand on "one hoof." So he is a forerunner of [[Menno Simons (1496-1561)|Menno Simons]], who was averse to mystics and false allegories, and who states contrary to the Münsterites and [[Davidjorists|Davidjorists]] that the Scriptures are plain, and that one should teach and believe the express words of Christ. On this question see the writings of Melchior Hoffman.
 = Bibliography =
-Cramer, Samuel and Fredrik Pijper. <em>Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica.</em> The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1903-1914<em></em>: V, 167, 177, 188, 189; VII, 137.
+Cramer, Samuel and Fredrik Pijper. <em>Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica.</em> The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1903-1914: V, 167, 177, 188, 189; VII, 137.
 <em>Doopsgezinde Bijdragen</em> (1917): 133-135.
 {{GAMEO_footer|hp=Vol. 2, p. 508|date=1956|a1_last=Zijpp|a1_first=Nanne van der|a2_last=|a2_first=}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 20 January 2014
Line 4:		Line 4:

	<em>Doopsgezinde Bijdragen</em> (1917): 133-135.		<em>Doopsgezinde Bijdragen</em> (1917): 133-135.
−	{{GAMEO_footer\|hp=Vol. 2, p. 508\|date=1956\|a1_last=~~van der~~ Zijpp\|a1_first=Nanne\|a2_last=\|a2_first=}}	+	{{GAMEO_footer\|hp=Vol. 2, p. 508\|date=1956\|a1_last=Zijpp\|a1_first=Nanne van der\|a2_last=\|a2_first=}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Gespauwde Klauw (Cloven Hoof). In the fall of 1534 a dispute took place at [[Amsterdam (Noord-Holland, Netherlands)|Amsterdam]] between the [[Anabaptism|Anabaptists]] leaders [[Jacob van Campen (1505-1535)|Jacob van Campen]], [[Obbe Philips (ca. 1500-1568)|Obbe Philips]], and [[Hans Scheerder (16th century)|Hans Scheerder]]. The theme of discussion was the question whether the Scriptures stand on "one hoof" or on "two hoofs," i.e., whether one should believe "that all that has happened in the Old Covenant corresponds with the New Covenant," meaning that the prophecies of the [[Old Testament|Old Testament]] will be realized in the [[New Testament|New Testament]], or that the Scriptures of the Old Testament are plain, not supposing a fulfillment in the Christian era. This theme is also repeatedly discussed by [[Hoffman, Melchior (ca. 1495-1544?) |Melchior Hoffman]], who defends the cloven hoof. "Ein ider muss der gespaltnen clawen wol warnemen. Denn alle Gottes wort doppelt oder zwiffach seint" ([[Linden, Friedrich Otto zur (1857-1927)|zur Linden]], <em>Melchior Hofmann</em>, 430). The expression "cloven hoof" is derived from Leviticus 11:3 and Deuteronomy 14:6; the theme is important, inasmuch as the problem disturbed Anabaptism in the [[Netherlands|Netherlands]] in its early period and Hoffman's theory, adopted by Jacob van Campen and also by Cornelis wt den Briel and later by the [[Münster Anabaptists|Münsterite]] leaders, opened the door wide for an unsound and dangerous typologizing and for the idea that the [[Kingdom of God|kingdom of God]] should bear the traits of the earthly kingdom of Israel, as[[Beukelszoon, Jan (ca. 1509-1536)|Jan van Leyden]] taught. On the other hand Obbe Philips could not believe that the Scriptures have a double meaning, asserting that the Scriptures stand on "one hoof." So he is a forerunner of [[Menno Simons (1496-1561)|Menno Simons]], who was averse to mystics and false allegories, and who states contrary to the Münsterites and [[Davidjorists|Davidjorists]] that the Scriptures are plain, and that one should teach and believe the express words of Christ. On this question see the writings of Melchior Hoffman.
+Gespauwde Klauw (Cloven Hoof). In the fall of 1534 a dispute took place at [[Amsterdam (Noord-Holland, Netherlands)|Amsterdam]] between the [[Anabaptism|Anabaptists]] leaders [[Jacob van Campen (1505-1535)|Jacob van Campen]], [[Obbe Philips (ca. 1500-1568)|Obbe Philips]], and [[Hans Scheerder (16th century)|Hans Scheerder]]. The theme of discussion was the question whether the Scriptures stand on "one hoof" or on "two hoofs," i.e., whether one should believe "that all that has happened in the Old Covenant corresponds with the New Covenant," meaning that the prophecies of the [[Old Testament|Old Testament]] will be realized in the [[New Testament|New Testament]], or that the Scriptures of the Old Testament are plain, not supposing a fulfillment in the Christian era. This theme is also repeatedly discussed by [[Hoffman, Melchior (ca. 1495-1544?) |Melchior Hoffman]], who defends the cloven hoof. "Ein ider muss der gespaltnen clawen wol warnemen. Denn alle Gottes wort doppelt oder zwiffach seint" ([[Linden, Friedrich Otto zur (1857-1927)|zur Linden]], <em>Melchior Hofmann</em>, 430). The expression "cloven hoof" is derived from Leviticus 11:3 and Deuteronomy 14:6; the theme is important, inasmuch as the problem disturbed Anabaptism in the [[Netherlands|Netherlands]] in its early period and Hoffman's theory, adopted by Jacob van Campen and also by Cornelis wt den Briel and later by the [[Münster Anabaptists|Münsterite]] leaders, opened the door wide for an unsound and dangerous typologizing and for the idea that the [[Kingdom of God|kingdom of God]] should bear the traits of the earthly kingdom of Israel, as[[Beukelszoon, Jan (ca. 1509-1536)| Jan van Leyden]] taught. On the other hand Obbe Philips could not believe that the Scriptures have a double meaning, asserting that the Scriptures stand on "one hoof." So he is a forerunner of [[Menno Simons (1496-1561)|Menno Simons]], who was averse to mystics and false allegories, and who states contrary to the Münsterites and [[Davidjorists|Davidjorists]] that the Scriptures are plain, and that one should teach and believe the express words of Christ. On this question see the writings of Melchior Hoffman.
 = Bibliography =
 Cramer, Samuel and Fredrik Pijper. <em>Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica.</em> The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1903-1914<em></em>: V, 167, 177, 188, 189; VII, 137.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Gespauwde Klauw (Cloven Hoof). In the fall of 1534 a dispute took place at [[Amsterdam (Noord-Holland, Netherlands)|Amsterdam]] between the [[Anabaptism|Anabaptists]] leaders [[Jacob van Campen (1505-1535)|Jacob van Campen]], [[Obbe Philips (ca. 1500-1568)|Obbe Philips]], and [[Hans Scheerder (16th century)|Hans Scheerder]]. The theme of discussion was the question whether the Scriptures stand on "one hoof" or on "two hoofs," i.e., whether one should believe "that all that has happened in the Old Covenant corresponds with the New Covenant," meaning that the prophecies of the [[Old Testament|Old Testament]] will be realized in the [[New Testament|New Testament]], or that the Scriptures of the Old Testament are plain, not supposing a fulfillment in the Christian era. This theme is also repeatedly discussed by [[Hoffman, Melchior (ca. 1495-1544?) |Melchior Hoffman]], who defends the cloven hoof. "Ein ider muss der gespaltnen clawen wol warnemen. Denn alle Gottes wort doppelt oder zwiffach seint" ([[Linden, Friedrich Otto zur (1857-1927)|zur Linden]], <em>Melchior Hofmann</em>, 430). The expression "cloven hoof" is derived from Leviticus 11:3 and Deuteronomy 14:6; the theme is important, inasmuch as the problem disturbed Anabaptism in the [[Netherlands|Netherlands]] in its early period and Hoffman's theory, adopted by Jacob van Campen and also by Cornelis wt den Briel and later by the [[Münster Anabaptists|Münsterite]] leaders, opened the door wide for an unsound and dangerous typologizing and for the idea that the [[Kingdom of God|kingdom of God]] should bear the traits of the earthly kingdom of Israel, as[[Beukelszoon, Jan (ca. 1509-1536)|Jan van Leyden]] taught. On the other hand Obbe Philips could not believe that the Scriptures have a double meaning, asserting that the Scriptures stand on "one hoof." So he is a forerunner of [[Menno Simons (1496-1561)|Menno Simons]], who was averse to mystics and false allegories, and who states contrary to the Münsterites and [[Davidjorists|Davidjorists]] that the Scriptures are plain, and that one should teach and believe the express words of Christ. On this question see the writings of Melchior Hoffman.
 = Bibliography =
 Cramer, Samuel and Fredrik Pijper. <em>Bibliotheca Reformatoria Neerlandica.</em> The Hague: M. Nijhoff, 1903-1914<em></em>: V, 167, 177, 188, 189; VII, 137.
 <em>Doopsgezinde Bijdragen</em> (1917): 133-135.
 {{GAMEO_footer|hp=Vol. 2, p. 508|date=1956|a1_last=van der Zijpp|a1_first=Nanne|a2_last=|a2_first=}}